Interneto jurisdikcijos simpoziumas – kviečiame dalyvauti

Posted on Tema: BISAC renginiai
Internet Jurisdiction Symposium 2014
IJS 2014

Šių metų rugsėjo 10-11 dienomis, Aberistvyto miestelyje (Jungtinė Karalystė) vyks Interneto jurisdikcijos simpoziumas, organizuojamas Aberistvyto universiteto Teisės ir kriminologijos bei Tarptautinių santykių departamentų. VšĮ Baltijos informacinės visuomenės analizės centras (BISAC) – oficialus simpoziumo transliacijos partneris, veiksiantis kaip nuotolinė simpoziumo auditorija.

Tiesioginė simpoziumo transliacija bus rodoma BISAC biure pagal oficialią renginio programą. Renginio metu bus galima užduoti klausimus pranešėjams.

Kviečiame registruotis visus, norinčius dalyvauti simpoziume – vietų skaičius ribotas: registracija baigta.


Apie renginį

Organizatorių tekstas

This conference investigates the sharpening conflict between national law and state sovereignty on the one hand, and global online communications on the other hand. We appear to be at the brink of a potentially drastic transformation of the Internet into a much more territorially fragmented space, consisting of a number of separate, yet overlapping national and regional networks. Even European leaders are investigating the possibility of a European-only communication network, strongly reminiscent of China’s approach to online governance. The Westphalian model of state sovereignty is fighting back – but at what cost and what are the alternatives?

The discussion of this conference seeks to advance the established yet stale academic debate on internet jurisdiction by taking a multi-disciplinary approach, going beyond the conventional parameters of the legal analysis. Rather than focus on specific jurisdictional rules and frameworks (all of which are premised on the continued viability of effective national laws in the global arena, i.e. the very matter in contention), the starting point of the discussion of this conference is the proposition that effective national law and unhindered transnational communications are irreconcilable and that any ‘compromise’ is indeed a compromise that comes at a cost either to peculiar national laws/values or free transnational communications or in fact both: you cannot have your cake and eat it too. With the acceptance of this position, it becomes possible to ground the debate in higher legal and political values, such as freedom of expression, democratic governance and the preservation of cultural identity/diversity, and to interrogate the possibilities of catering for these values through re-negotiated forms of governance.

The focus of the symposium is not Internet security/surveillance, but it is the issue of diversity of laws/values in the context of a global communication medium. There are some intersections between these areas e.g. where States have different surveillance standards and their enforcement problems when the relevant infrastructure is not on their territory.